Is your membership CRM ready for your 2026 growth plans?

Image generated by AI

There comes a point for some membership organisations when the CRM system holding everything together begins to show its age.

Processes still function, logins still work, and the organisation continues to do what it has always done. Yet, in the background, the everyday experience of staff and members begins to shift.

Tasks might start taking longer, data becomes harder to trust and reporting requires workarounds that were never meant to be permanent. What once felt manageable gradually turns into something that shapes the pace and possibility of the entire membership offer.

The attraction of ‘good enough for now’

Some organisations may choose to carry on regardless, especially when budgets are stretched and change feels disruptive. In these instances, it is easy to convince yourself that the CRM system is ‘good enough for now’, particularly when the alternative feels like a significant undertaking.

Often, this happens gradually. Teams don’t decide to accept inefficiency — they adapt to it. A workaround here, a spreadsheet there, a manual fix introduced to solve a short-term problem. Over time, these temporary solutions become normalised, and the organisation stops seeing the system clearly because everyone is busy working around it.

Afterall, the pattern might be familiar to you already: just one more year, just one more renewal cycle, just one more member campaign delivered through a patchwork of spreadsheets, email threads, and manual fixes. But beneath that instinct to delay sits a truth.

Doing nothing is not a neutral choice. It actively shapes how the organisation operates day to day — influencing its ability to grow, respond to members, and deliver the experience the team works so hard to provide.

When an outdated CRM system consumes capacity

For teams relying on outdated or heavily bespoke CRM systems, this often shows up first in staff capacity. Hours that could be spent developing new initiatives or improving member engagement are instead devoted to tasks that should take minutes.

Renewal journeys that ought to run automatically become a series of manual interventions. Reporting that should clarify performance becomes a monthly frustration. Over time, this drains not just time but confidence, and the weight of these intangible losses is felt most in small teams who are already doing more than their capacity suggests.

What your members might be experiencing

Members may feel the impact as well. Delayed responses, inconsistent experiences, fragmented communication and limited access to benefits will all erode the sense of belonging and value that sits at the heart of a strong membership offer.

In a time where members increasingly expect personalised, timely and seamless digital experiences, outdated CRM systems make it difficult to meet those expectations. The organisation may still be delivering its services, but the experience behind them begins to fall short of what members intuitively compare it to elsewhere.

If reporting is unclear, growth is uncertain

The impact extends into reporting and decision-making. Older CRM systems often make it difficult to answer questions that leadership rely on: which member segments are most engaged, where churn risks are emerging, which benefits drive retention, and how effective onboarding has been.

Without trustworthy reporting, the ability to plan for growth becomes more uncertain. Strategic decisions become cautious rather than confident, and boards are left without the clarity they need to invest in new initiatives.

A real-world example: when ‘making do’ becomes unsustainable

Real-world examples make this more relatable. The Biochemical Society reached a point where their previous CRM system, heavily customised and increasingly unstable, was no longer supporting their work.

Fields populated incorrectly, direct debits failed, payments malfunctioned and the onboarding process had become a barrier. What began as small inconveniences eventually created a web of inaccuracies that undermined trust in the data and placed constant pressure on staff.

When they transitioned to sheepCRM, the difference was immediate. Processes stabilised, payments processed reliably, and members experienced a smoother, clearer journey. Perhaps most importantly, the team regained the confidence to focus on engagement rather than firefighting.

What this showcases is not simply the benefit of a modern membership CRM, but the cost of persevering with systems that no longer support the organisation’s ambitions, particularly in growth.

Why modernisation becomes essential for 2026 growth

In many ways, the decision to modernise a CRM is less about technology and more about readiness for the next stage of the organisation’s journey. It is about putting the right foundations in place — accurate data, reliable processes, and systems the team can trust — so future plans are genuinely achievable.

Growth plans for 2026 — whether they involve new services, expanded member campaigns, or deeper engagement — require systems that can sustain them. Outdated tools limit what can realistically be delivered. They slow innovation, narrow ambition and quietly reduce the organisation’s ability to respond to changing expectations.

For example, an organisation may want to improve member engagement, but without accurate data or the ability to track interactions, it cannot reliably understand what members value or where improvements are needed. Without those foundations, ambition quickly outpaces reality.

Choosing to continue with the current system is, in effect, choosing to constrain the organisation’s future potential.

Take time to reflect

Taking the time to reflect is often the first step. It allows teams to look at their systems with fresh eyes and to acknowledge the gap between what they want to achieve and what their tools allow them to do.

For many organisations, this begins with gathering examples: renewal processes that absorb far too much time; member journeys that rely on manual fixes; reporting that never quite reconciles; staff who carry the anxiety of being the only person who understands how to operate the system.

These observations, shared internally, become the foundation of a more honest discussion about whether the organisation is equipped for the year ahead. Our CRM Membership Planner can be extremely helpful at this stage so that you can make an assessment of your current tools and processes.

Creating the conditions for clarity

From there, the next step is rarely about rushing into change. It is about creating the conditions for clarity. Using our Membership CRM Health-check can give organisations a structured way to assess whether their system still supports their goals.

For those who are ready to explore options, an early discovery call often brings reassurance — and helps translate concerns into a clearer understanding of what a modern, membership-focused CRM can unlock.

A clearer route forward

We find that the organisations that take these steps tend to move forward with greater confidence. They make decisions based on factual evidence rather than emotional frustration, and they approach CRM change as a strategic enabler rather than a disruptive risk. Most importantly, they ensure that their systems support — rather than restrict — their ambitions for 2026 and beyond.

If your organisation is beginning to feel the strain of an outdated CRM or is questioning whether it can sustain plans for the year ahead, our Membership CRM Health-check can help you take the first step towards clarity.

And if you'd like to explore what modern membership operations could look like for your team, you can book a conversation with one of our experts for an open, informal discussion about your options.

FAQ

• How do I know if our CRM is genuinely holding us back — or if we just need better processes?

  A helpful starting point is to look at patterns rather than isolated frustrations. If your team is consistently relying on manual fixes, if reporting causes doubt rather than clarity, or if member journeys require constant intervention, these are usually signs that the limitation is structural rather than procedural.

• What are the biggest risks of staying with an ageing or heavily customised CRM?

  The risks tend to appear gradually: increasing staff time lost to admin, inconsistent data that wears down confidence, delays in member communication, and a widening gap between what your members expect and what your tools can deliver. Over time, these pressures mount up. We find that what begins as inconvenience eventually becomes a barrier to growth, resilience, and member satisfaction.

• How do I explain to leadership that “doing nothing” has a cost?

  This is a great question. Our advice is to focus on outcomes rather than technology. Highlight where the current system limits your ability to increase retention, improve engagement, or scale services. Boards respond well to evidence: examples of time lost, unreliable reporting, or missed opportunities. Framing the conversation around organisational readiness for 2026 — rather than “buying a new system” — often creates far stronger alignment.

• Do we need to replace everything at once?

  Not at all. Most organisations begin with reflection, and then planning. Reviewing tools like the Membership CRM Health-check can help you understand where the gaps are. Change does not need to be immediate or overwhelming; it simply needs to be intentional. Many teams we have worked with modernise in phases, focusing first on the areas that most directly influence member experience and operational efficiency.